The SafetyPro Podcast
News • Business • Education
This community is all about safety professionals supporting each other. I wanted to create a space for us to support each other, share our thoughts, ideas, and resources confidentially - with trust and integrity. Join me in the SafetyPro Community TODAY!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Western District of Texas Says NLRB Structure Unconstitutional

In its lawsuit, SpaceX argues that the NLRB’s structure is unconstitutional because NLRB Board Members and Administrative Law Judges (ALJ) are not removable by the President of the United States, in violation of Article II of the U.S. Constitution. U.S. District Court Judge Alan Albright issued the injunction, finding that SpaceX was likely to succeed on the merits of its argument that the NLRB’s structure violates the Constitution, relying, in part, on the holding by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jarkesy et al. v. SEC.

In addition, Judge Albright found that Board Members are unconstitutional for the same reason—that their insulation from removal by the President violates Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Specifically, Judge Albright held that because the Board Members “wield substantial executive power,” the inability of the President to remove Board Members is an impermissible limitation by Congress on the President’s executive power under Article II “to take care that laws be faithfully executed.”

Similar to the recent challenge to the Constitutionality of OSHA's power, we may see more cases upending the independent power of regulatory agencies.

https://natlawreview.com/article/western-district-texas-says-nlrb-structure-unconstitutional-issues-injunction

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Coffee Topic: A Decade of Podcasting! 🎉

Happy Tuesday! Wow, 10 years already? What are your most memorable moments from the last ten years? What do you want to see more of over the next ten?👇

00:13:11
Coffee Topic: To Stand or Sit...or neither?

Happy Tuesday! I ran across an interesting article about standing desks. I had to channel Lori Frederic, @theMovementNinja on this one. Movement is LIFE! Check it out.👇

00:10:50
Coffee Topic: Weekly Recap - Book Announcement (sort of)

Happy Friday! Let's do a weekly recap! Drop your successes and weekend plans. 👇

00:12:08
California Outdoor Heat Illness Regulations: Key Measures for Summer Heat Inspections

This Ogletree Deakins podcast episode delves into the California outdoor heat illness standard, focusing on implementation and Cal/OSHA enforcement.

Kevin Bland and Karen Tynan discuss effective outdoor heat illness training practices for supervisors and employees, the benefits of onboarding training, and water and shade access requirements, and also offer best practices for employers implementing high-heat procedures.

California Outdoor Heat Illness Regulations: Key Measures for Summer Heat Inspections
Dirty Steel-Toe Boots, Episode 10: Corporate Counsel’s Role Managing OSHA Compliance

In this episode of Dirty Steel-Toe Boots, host Phillip B. Russell has an enlightening conversation with Lori Baggett, an in-house corporate counsel with responsibility for legal issues related to workplace safety and health and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Lori discusses how her experience as a former outside counsel helps her add value to her role as vice president and assistant general counsel. She offers practical tips for in-house counsels responsible for OSHA matters, including those with limited experience in this area.

Lori also shares some tips for in-house safety professionals on best working with their legal departments to improve safety and manage liability. Phillip and Lori have a candid and insightful discussion about diversity, equity, and inclusion in the legal profession.

Dirty Steel-Toe Boots, Episode 10: Corporate Counsel’s Role Managing OSHA Compliance
EP 116: Safety and the Younger Workforce

A comprehensive public health strategy is needed to protect younger workers, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention researchers say after their recent study showing that the rate of nonfatal on-the-job injuries among 15- to 24-year-olds is between 1.2 and 2.3 times higher than that of the 25-44 age group. Have a listen and join in on the conversation - what has been your experience working with younger workers and safety?👇

EP 116: Safety and the Younger Workforce
Make it RAIN!

Do you know what to do if you discover a HAZMAT incident that you're not trained and/or authorized to respond to? Remember the acronym "R-A-I-N":

  • RECOGNIZE the hazard by looking for indications of a chemical leak/spill/release, such as unusual odors and/or sounds, visible leaks, etc.;
  • AVOID the hazard/area so that you're not exposed to toxic concentrations of the hazardous chemical(s);
  • ISOLATE the area to prevent exposing others to danger by putting up barricades, danger tape, or some other type of barrier from a safe distance, as well as evacuating others from the area (if it's safe for you to do so);
  • NOTIFY internal and external responders by following your organization's emergency action plan (EAP), calling 911, and initiating other site-specific procedures.

This acronym/concept is often taught during HAZMAT/WMD Awareness courses to help students remember what they're trained to do.

What other HAZMAT-related acronyms have you heard or used?

post photo preview
One of the hardest questions for a safety pro to answer...

When is it time to move on? 🤷‍♂️ Or, is it that difficult?

We have all been there, and it is never easy. Usually, we start with ourselves:

  • Have I done enough?
  • Did I miss something?
  • Do I need to push harder?
  • Do I go over my manager's head?
  • Should I state my case differently to someone else?

All valid questions. Still, how do we know when we have actually done enough?

🎬 In this video, Jocko Willink and Leif Babin, the authors of the NY Times #1 Bestseller, "Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win", let you know when it's the right time to leave your job.

🤔 It was interesting that Jocko used workplace safety as an example of how you can tell when it is time to go!

📣 PREMIUM MEMBERS: I want to hear your perspectives, especially considering we have a lot of safety pros that are still early in their career development. Drop your comments 👇

🎉 Celebrating 10 Years of The SafetyPro Podcast! 🎉

This month marks an incredible milestone for The SafetyPro Podcast—our 10th anniversary! Over the past decade, we’ve grown from an idea into a vibrant community dedicated to advancing workplace safety. I’ve had the privilege of presenting at safety conferences, podcasting live from various safety events, launching The SafetyPro Podcast community site, connecting with many passionate safety professionals, and making friends who inspire me daily.

None of this would be possible without our amazing followers who tune in, engage, and drive meaningful conversations around safety. Of course, bringing the production to life would not have been possible without the incredible partnership and support from @Agoecke MightyLine Floor Tape and @TheSafetyDoc Arrow Safety. Thanks for believing in what this little podcast can do for our profession! Here’s to many more years of learning, connecting, and making workplaces safer together!

post photo preview
post photo preview
California's New Workplace Violence Prevention Law
What you need to know

California's New Workplace Violence Prevention Law

Starting July 1, 2024, California's first general industry workplace violence prevention law requires nearly all employers, including retail, to adopt a Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP) under Senate Bill 553 (California Labor Code section 6401.9).

Key Requirements:

  • WVPP Adoption: Employers must establish and maintain a WVPP, which can be standalone or part of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
  • Employee Training: Mandatory training on workplace violence risks and safety protocols.
  • Incident Logging: Detailed records of every violent incident and related investigations must be kept.
  • Plan Customization: WVPPs must be tailored to specific hazards at each location.
  • Regular Review: Annual reviews or more frequent updates if deficiencies or incidents occur.
  • Accessibility: WVPPs must be easily accessible to all employees.
  • Non-Retaliation: Employers cannot retaliate against employees seeking help from emergency services during violent incidents.

Exceptions:

  • Remote workers at locations that are not under employer control. You're on your own!
  • Locations with fewer than 10 employees that are not public-facing and comply with existing Cal/OSHA regulations. That seems to be the standard cut-off for needing additional protections.
  • Certain healthcare facilities and law enforcement agencies. Just certain ones, tho.

Important Notes:

  • Animal attacks are classified as workplace violence. Yes, you read that correctly.
  • Employee involvement in developing the WVPP is required.
  • Employers should avoid top-down corporate plans unless hazards are consistent across all locations. So, location-specific plans are needed.

This new law underscores the importance of the need for measures to address potential injury from violence in the workplace. For more detailed information, visit the California Legislative Information site.


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for over 28 years and is the author of "Rethinking SAFETY Culture" and "Rethinking SAFETY Communications," available now. Blaine is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast community site.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Tired of the 9-to-5? Work from Italy 🇮🇹
Digital Nomad Visas for Italy? Che bello!

On April 4, 2024, the Italian government introduced a new visa for Digital Nomads, allowing highly skilled non-EU workers to live and work in Italy remotely for more than 90 days. So, if you want to get your never-ending pasta fix, here's what you need to know:

Eligibility Requirements:

  • Income: Minimum annual income from legal sources must be at least three times the minimum threshold for health care exemption.
  • Health Insurance: Must cover medical treatment and hospitalization for the entire stay.
  • Accommodation: Proof of adequate housing arrangements.
  • Experience: At least six months of prior relevant work experience.
  • Employment Agreement: Valid job offer or employment contract that meets specific legislative criteria.

Application Process:

  • Visa: Apply at the relevant diplomatic-consular office with a statement from the employer confirming no recent convictions for aiding illegal immigration and a copy of an identification document.
  • Residence Permit: Must be applied for within eight days of entering Italy, issued by the Questura for up to one year, and renewable annually.

Additional Information:

  • Tax Compliance: Upon receipt of the residence permit, an Italian tax code will be issued. Self-employed individuals must obtain a VAT number.
  • Social Security: Bilateral agreements apply if in place; otherwise, Italian social security laws govern coverage.
  • Family Reunification: Permitted with the same visa duration as the Digital Nomad.

Revocation Conditions:

  • The visa and residence permit can be refused or revoked if the employer or employee fails to comply with legal requirements or has recent convictions related to illegal immigration.

This new visa simplifies the process for Digital Nomads to enjoy extended stays in Italy while contributing their skills remotely - Evviva!


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for over 28 years and is the author of "Rethinking SAFETY Culture" and "Rethinking SAFETY Communications," available now. Blaine is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast community site.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Washington's RCW 49.84 for Warehouse Distribution Centers
It's impact on workers and businesses

The enactment of RCW 49.84 in the state fo Washington targets the operational dynamics of warehouse distribution centers. This law, effective from July 1, 2024, introduces a series of comprehensive measures seeking to safeguard warehouse employees against "unreasonable quotas and working conditions." So, let's break down key sections of RCW 49.84.

Definitions and Scope

RCW 49.84 sets out clear definitions for key terms such as "employer," "employee," and "quota," ensuring that the law's provisions are applied consistently across all applicable entities. An "employer" is defined broadly as any entity controlling the work conditions of 100 or more employees at a single site or 1,000 employees across multiple sites in the state of Washington, highlighting the law's intent to cover significant employers in the industry.

Employer Obligations

Central to RCW 49.84 is the obligation placed on employers to provide transparent and detailed descriptions of any quotas that employees are expected to meet, including the tasks to be performed, the speed required, and the potential consequences of failing to meet these quotas. Employers are also mandated to keep accurate records of employee performance relative to these quotas, ensuring that there is a factual basis for any disciplinary actions taken as a result of not meeting such quotas.

Time Requirements for Quotas

A significant aspect of the law is that time allocated for quotas must include periods for rest breaks and other non-task activities and hopes to ensure that employees are not penalized for taking legally mandated breaks or for time spent in essential non-task activities, such as using restroom facilities or moving between different areas of a warehouse.

Violations of RCW 49.84 occur when employers set quotas that do not allow for these time considerations or fail to provide the requisite quota information to employees. Penalties for non-compliance can be severe.

Enforcement and Compliance

The Department of Labor and Industries is tasked with enforcing these regulations. It has the authority to investigate complaints and assess penalties, which includes the ability to conduct audits and require employers to make necessary adjustments to their operational practices.

Employees and employers can appeal the Department's decisions regarding alleged law violations. This appeal process ensures fairness and allows for a thorough review of the facts before any penalties are finalized.

Implementation Timeline

The law's provisions are set to take effect on July 1, 2024, allowing employers some time to adjust their practices and ensure full compliance as well as for outreach and education efforts to inform all stakeholders about the new requirements.

The Results?

While RCW 49.84 seeks to improve working conditions in warehouse distribution centers, it also presents several potential drawbacks:

  1. Increased Operational Costs: Employers may face higher costs due to additional administrative work needing to comply with the law, including updating systems to track quotas and work speed data accurately.
  2. Reduced Flexibility: The specific requirements for time accounting in quotas could reduce operational flexibility, making it harder for warehouses to quickly respond to fluctuating customer and business demands.
  3. Potential for Reduced Productivity: By imposing strict regulations on how quotas are set and enforced, overall productivity could decrease if employees and managers focus more on compliance than on efficiency. Furthermore, most businesses have already set realistic quotas that fully accommodate all legally mandated breaks or the realistic pacing of work throughout a shift.
  4. Legal and Compliance Risks: The complexity of the new rules might increase the risk of inadvertent non-compliance, potentially leading to legal challenges and penalties, which could be costly and time-consuming for businesses.
  5. Impact on Small Businesses: Smaller warehouse operators might find the requirements particularly burdensome, as they may need more resources to easily adjust their operations and management practices to comply with the new law.

These challenges suggest that while the law seeks to protect workers, it also necessitates careful implementation to avoid undue burden on warehouse operations, especially in a competitive economic environment. What do you think? Join in on the conversation. Become a member of the SafetyPro Podcast Community site today!


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for over 28 years and is the author of "Rethinking SAFETY Culture" and "Rethinking SAFETY Communications," available now. Blaine is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast community site.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals