The SafetyPro Podcast
News • Business • Education
Using a Cognitive Interview Technique for Safety Incidents
Stop interrogating workers!
Guest contributors: BlaineJHoffmann
post photo preview

Workplace incidents are never something that employers and employees look forward to experiencing. However, they do happen, and it's important for everyone involved to understand what happened and how it happened, which will require you to interview those involved in the incident. So it stands to reason you will want to ask the right questions correctly to elicit the most accurate information possible. A cognitive interview technique is one of the most effective ways to do this.

In this article, we'll discuss how cognitive interviews work and why they're helpful for workplace incidents. 

What is a Cognitive Interview Technique?

A cognitive interview technique is a method of questioning designed to encourage interviewees to provide as much detail as possible about an incident. It's called "cognitive" because it focuses on people's mental processes to remember events. It is based on the idea that memory is constructive; our memories are not perfect representations of what happened but a reconstruction of what we think we experienced.

There are several benefits to using a cognitive interview technique for workplace incidents:

  • Obtain Detailed and Accurate Information
    Cognitive interviews are designed to gather as much detailed and accurate information about the incident as possible. This information can help you understand what happened, how it happened, and how to prevent it from happening again. Cognitive interviews can help establish a consistent timeline and identify discrepancies in the various accounts in cases with multiple witnesses to an incident.
  • Prevention
    Investigating workplace incidents is essential for preventing future incidents from occurring. By using cognitive interviews to gather information about an incident, you can identify the underlying causes of the incident and take corrective action to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.
  • Continuous improvement
    Workplace incidents can provide valuable insights into other areas where improvements can be made. By using cognitive interviews to gather information about an incident, you can identify opportunities for improvement and implement changes to prevent related incidents from occurring in other processes or areas of the workplace.
  • Employee engagement
    Using cognitive interviews as part of the incident investigation process can also help to engage employees in the investigation process. By encouraging employees to share their experiences and perspectives on the incident, you can demonstrate commitment to workplace safety, build trust with employees, and create a more robust safety culture.
  • Compliance
    In many industries, employers are required by law to investigate workplace incidents. Using cognitive interviews as part of your incident investigation process, one can meet legal requirements and comply with regulations. Thoroughly investigating workplace safety incidents and taking corrective action can demonstrate that the company is taking the necessary steps to ensure the safety of its employees, which can help reduce the likelihood of legal action being taken.

How to Conduct a Cognitive Interview

During a cognitive interview, the interviewer may use several techniques that encourage the interviewee to provide a detailed description of the incident. When conducting a cognitive interview, following a structured approach is essential. Here are some techniques for conducting a successful cognitive interview:

  1. Establish rapport with the interviewee: The interviewee should feel comfortable and at ease before the interview begins. Establishing rapport can help put the interviewee at ease and encourage them to provide more detailed information.
  2. Ask Open-Ended Questions: Open-ended questions encourage the interviewee to provide a detailed description of the incident. They should be asked in a non-leading way to avoid influencing the interviewee's memory.
  3. Free recall: In this technique, the interviewer asks the interviewee to provide a full account of the event without interruption. This technique encourages the interviewee to recall as much detail as possible without being influenced by the interviewer.
  4. Mental reinstatement: This technique involves asking the interviewee to recreate the context and environment of the event mentally. The interviewee is encouraged to recall sensory details such as sounds, smells, and colors to aid in recalling the event.
  5. Change perspective: In this technique, the interviewee is asked to recall the event from different perspectives, such as from the viewpoint of another person present during the event. This technique can help to uncover new details and views on the event.
  6. Repeated retrieval: This technique involves asking the interviewee to recall the event multiple times over a period of time. This technique can help to consolidate memories and recall information that may have been missed in previous interviews.
  7. Timeline: This technique involves asking the interviewee to provide a chronological event timeline. This technique can help identify discrepancies or inconsistencies in the interviewee's event account.

These techniques are used in different combinations depending on the specific needs of the investigation. By properly using these techniques, investigators can elicit more accurate and detailed information about an event, which can be used to prevent future incidents and ensure workplace safety.

Pro Tip: Building Backward

One powerful twist to applying the timeline technique mentioned above is asking an interviewee to remember workplace incident events in reverse order. There are several benefits when asking someone to remember events in an order they may not be used to recalling:

  • Encourages a Different Recall Method: Asking an interviewee to recall the events of an incident in reverse order can help stimulate a different recall method. Typically, people tend to recall events in the order they happened. However, asking them to recall events in reverse order can encourage them to think more deeply about the incident and may bring to light details they may have forgotten or missed when remembering events chronologically.
  • It helps to Identify Inaccuracies or Discrepancies in the Interviewee's Account: Recalling events in reverse order can help interviewers identify inaccuracies or discrepancies in the interviewee's account of the incident. If an interviewee's account changes or becomes unclear when recalling the events in reverse order, it may indicate that they are not being truthful or that their recollection of events is inaccurate.
  • Reduces the Impact of Preconceptions and Expectations: Recalling events in reverse order can help reduce the impact of preconceptions or expectations that interviewees may have about the incident. Interviewees may have biases or assumptions about the sequence of events, and asking them to recall events in reverse order can help to mitigate these biases and ensure that the account is more accurate.

Overall, asking an interviewee to recall workplace incident events in reverse order can help investigators to gain a more accurate and detailed understanding of what happened.

It is essential to remember that conducting a cognitive interview for workplace incidents requires proper training and preparation. Interviewers need to understand the cognitive processes involved in memory and the various techniques used in cognitive interviewing to ensure that the interview is effective and accurate.

Tips for Interview Success

First and foremost, it's essential to approach the worker with empathy and understanding. Recognize that they may be feeling anxious, upset, or even traumatized by the incident, and make it clear that you're there to support them and help them get through this difficult time.

Here are a few other tips that can help make the worker more comfortable:

  1. Start by thanking the worker for their time and willingness to talk to you. Let them know that you appreciate their help in understanding what happened and how to prevent it in the future.
  2. Create a safe and confidential space for the interview. Choose a private location where the worker won't be interrupted or overheard if possible. Let them know that anything they say will be kept confidential and won't be used against them in any way. Don't place an object, like a desk, between you and the interviewee - sit with them. Let them sit near the door and give them a comfortable chair - all of these things can make the space safer for them to relax and feel more at ease.
  3. Be respectful and non-judgmental in your tone and body language. Don't interrupt the worker or argue with them, even if you disagree with what they're saying. Show that you're listening carefully and taking their words seriously.
  4. Offer support and resources if the worker needs them. Depending on the nature of the incident, they may need medical attention, counseling, or other types of assistance. Let them know that you're there to help and that you can connect them with any resources they need.

These are not interrogations, where you have evidence that they have done something wrong and need them to confess. They can help you learn how work happens so you can look for opportunities to improve together, so the event does not happen again. - Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Remember, the goal of the post-incident interview is to learn from what happened and prevent it from happening again. By approaching the worker with empathy and understanding, you can help them feel more comfortable and willing to share their experiences and insights.

Conclusion

In summary, cognitive interviews are an effective tool for investigating workplace incidents. By using cognitive interviews as part of your incident investigation process, you can improve the accuracy of your investigations, prevent future incidents, comply with legal requirements, engage employees, and continuously improve your workplace safety programs.


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for 28 years. He is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast Community Site.

community logo
Join the The SafetyPro Podcast Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Coffee Topic: Left-Handers UNITE!

Happy Tuesday! It is Left-Handers Day🤚! Yes, that's a thing. And, it can be dangerous for them, it seems. Check it out.👇

00:06:35
[VIDEO] Episode 184: RCA FAQs w/Alex Paradies

In this episode, @BlaineJHoffmann talks with Alex Paradies from TapRoot about frequently asked questions regarding root cause analysis. Check it out👇

01:03:18
[VIDEO] Episode 183: OSHA Heat Illness Standard w/Phillip Russell

In this episode, @BlaineJHoffmann discusses the OSHA Heat Illness Standard with Phillip Russell. Will it stand after the SCOTUS decision to overturn the Chevron deference? Will it be amended? Check it out. 👇

00:56:19
California Outdoor Heat Illness Regulations: Key Measures for Summer Heat Inspections

This Ogletree Deakins podcast episode delves into the California outdoor heat illness standard, focusing on implementation and Cal/OSHA enforcement.

Kevin Bland and Karen Tynan discuss effective outdoor heat illness training practices for supervisors and employees, the benefits of onboarding training, and water and shade access requirements, and also offer best practices for employers implementing high-heat procedures.

California Outdoor Heat Illness Regulations: Key Measures for Summer Heat Inspections
Dirty Steel-Toe Boots, Episode 10: Corporate Counsel’s Role Managing OSHA Compliance

In this episode of Dirty Steel-Toe Boots, host Phillip B. Russell has an enlightening conversation with Lori Baggett, an in-house corporate counsel with responsibility for legal issues related to workplace safety and health and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Lori discusses how her experience as a former outside counsel helps her add value to her role as vice president and assistant general counsel. She offers practical tips for in-house counsels responsible for OSHA matters, including those with limited experience in this area.

Lori also shares some tips for in-house safety professionals on best working with their legal departments to improve safety and manage liability. Phillip and Lori have a candid and insightful discussion about diversity, equity, and inclusion in the legal profession.

Dirty Steel-Toe Boots, Episode 10: Corporate Counsel’s Role Managing OSHA Compliance
EP 116: Safety and the Younger Workforce

A comprehensive public health strategy is needed to protect younger workers, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention researchers say after their recent study showing that the rate of nonfatal on-the-job injuries among 15- to 24-year-olds is between 1.2 and 2.3 times higher than that of the 25-44 age group. Have a listen and join in on the conversation - what has been your experience working with younger workers and safety?👇

EP 116: Safety and the Younger Workforce
FDA Approves First Intranasal Spray for Severe Allergic Reactions

On Friday, the FDA announced the approval of Neffy, an epinephrine nasal spray by ARS Pharmaceuticals, for emergency treatment of allergic reactions in adults and pediatric patients who weigh more than 66 pounds. The decision helps patients move away from the needle most commonly used in the brand-named auto-injector EpiPen.

Do you think this will make it easier for lay responders to administer epinephrine to people experiencing anaphylactic shock?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/healthcare/fda-moves-needle-approves-first-nasal-spray-treatment-severe-allergic-reactions

Free Rigging a Forklift

I had another great question come up this week regarding "free rigging", which is the direct attachment to or placement of rigging equipment (e.g., slings, shackles, rings, etc.) onto the tines (forks) of a powered industrial truck (PIT) for a below-the-tines lift without the use of an approved lifting attachment.

𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Is the concept "free rigging" a PIT (e.g., forklift) an acceptable and compliant practice?

𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐀𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫: It depends, but typically, no.

𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫: At the end of the day, the easiest thing to do in most situations would be to use an approved attachment to make the lift. However, that may not always be an option for a variety of factors.
While "free rigging" is a pretty common practice in a variety of industries (especially construction), it is a violation of OSHA standards UNLESS you jump through a few hoops first.

Free rigging could affect the PIT's capacity and safe operation, so ...

post photo preview
Boeing Pleads Guilty to Fraud During US Investigation of Deadly 737 Max Crashes

The DOJ and Boeing are finalizing the full plea agreement and plan to file it in federal court in Texas by July 19. A judge must approve the plea deal.

A January 2021 DOJ Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with Boeing permitted the company to avoid criminal prosecution for these crashes so long as it complied with new safety obligations. In May 2024, the DOJ informed the aviation giant that it had failed "to design, implement, and enforce a compliance and ethics program to prevent and detect violations of the U.S. fraud laws throughout its operations."

The DOJ said the fraud violations related to Boeing’s knowingly false representations to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) about its new software that required less intensive pilot training and saved money. The software feature was supposed to automatically push the airplane’s nose down in certain conditions. A failure of this feature appeared to cause the two overseas 737 Max crashes.

Boeing became subject to ...

post photo preview
post photo preview
California's New Workplace Violence Prevention Law
What you need to know

California's New Workplace Violence Prevention Law

Starting July 1, 2024, California's first general industry workplace violence prevention law requires nearly all employers, including retail, to adopt a Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP) under Senate Bill 553 (California Labor Code section 6401.9).

Key Requirements:

  • WVPP Adoption: Employers must establish and maintain a WVPP, which can be standalone or part of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
  • Employee Training: Mandatory training on workplace violence risks and safety protocols.
  • Incident Logging: Detailed records of every violent incident and related investigations must be kept.
  • Plan Customization: WVPPs must be tailored to specific hazards at each location.
  • Regular Review: Annual reviews or more frequent updates if deficiencies or incidents occur.
  • Accessibility: WVPPs must be easily accessible to all employees.
  • Non-Retaliation: Employers cannot retaliate against employees seeking help from emergency services during violent incidents.

Exceptions:

  • Remote workers at locations that are not under employer control. You're on your own!
  • Locations with fewer than 10 employees that are not public-facing and comply with existing Cal/OSHA regulations. That seems to be the standard cut-off for needing additional protections.
  • Certain healthcare facilities and law enforcement agencies. Just certain ones, tho.

Important Notes:

  • Animal attacks are classified as workplace violence. Yes, you read that correctly.
  • Employee involvement in developing the WVPP is required.
  • Employers should avoid top-down corporate plans unless hazards are consistent across all locations. So, location-specific plans are needed.

This new law underscores the importance of the need for measures to address potential injury from violence in the workplace. For more detailed information, visit the California Legislative Information site.


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for over 28 years and is the author of "Rethinking SAFETY Culture" and "Rethinking SAFETY Communications," available now. Blaine is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast community site.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Tired of the 9-to-5? Work from Italy 🇮🇹
Digital Nomad Visas for Italy? Che bello!

On April 4, 2024, the Italian government introduced a new visa for Digital Nomads, allowing highly skilled non-EU workers to live and work in Italy remotely for more than 90 days. So, if you want to get your never-ending pasta fix, here's what you need to know:

Eligibility Requirements:

  • Income: Minimum annual income from legal sources must be at least three times the minimum threshold for health care exemption.
  • Health Insurance: Must cover medical treatment and hospitalization for the entire stay.
  • Accommodation: Proof of adequate housing arrangements.
  • Experience: At least six months of prior relevant work experience.
  • Employment Agreement: Valid job offer or employment contract that meets specific legislative criteria.

Application Process:

  • Visa: Apply at the relevant diplomatic-consular office with a statement from the employer confirming no recent convictions for aiding illegal immigration and a copy of an identification document.
  • Residence Permit: Must be applied for within eight days of entering Italy, issued by the Questura for up to one year, and renewable annually.

Additional Information:

  • Tax Compliance: Upon receipt of the residence permit, an Italian tax code will be issued. Self-employed individuals must obtain a VAT number.
  • Social Security: Bilateral agreements apply if in place; otherwise, Italian social security laws govern coverage.
  • Family Reunification: Permitted with the same visa duration as the Digital Nomad.

Revocation Conditions:

  • The visa and residence permit can be refused or revoked if the employer or employee fails to comply with legal requirements or has recent convictions related to illegal immigration.

This new visa simplifies the process for Digital Nomads to enjoy extended stays in Italy while contributing their skills remotely - Evviva!


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for over 28 years and is the author of "Rethinking SAFETY Culture" and "Rethinking SAFETY Communications," available now. Blaine is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast community site.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Washington's RCW 49.84 for Warehouse Distribution Centers
It's impact on workers and businesses

The enactment of RCW 49.84 in the state fo Washington targets the operational dynamics of warehouse distribution centers. This law, effective from July 1, 2024, introduces a series of comprehensive measures seeking to safeguard warehouse employees against "unreasonable quotas and working conditions." So, let's break down key sections of RCW 49.84.

Definitions and Scope

RCW 49.84 sets out clear definitions for key terms such as "employer," "employee," and "quota," ensuring that the law's provisions are applied consistently across all applicable entities. An "employer" is defined broadly as any entity controlling the work conditions of 100 or more employees at a single site or 1,000 employees across multiple sites in the state of Washington, highlighting the law's intent to cover significant employers in the industry.

Employer Obligations

Central to RCW 49.84 is the obligation placed on employers to provide transparent and detailed descriptions of any quotas that employees are expected to meet, including the tasks to be performed, the speed required, and the potential consequences of failing to meet these quotas. Employers are also mandated to keep accurate records of employee performance relative to these quotas, ensuring that there is a factual basis for any disciplinary actions taken as a result of not meeting such quotas.

Time Requirements for Quotas

A significant aspect of the law is that time allocated for quotas must include periods for rest breaks and other non-task activities and hopes to ensure that employees are not penalized for taking legally mandated breaks or for time spent in essential non-task activities, such as using restroom facilities or moving between different areas of a warehouse.

Violations of RCW 49.84 occur when employers set quotas that do not allow for these time considerations or fail to provide the requisite quota information to employees. Penalties for non-compliance can be severe.

Enforcement and Compliance

The Department of Labor and Industries is tasked with enforcing these regulations. It has the authority to investigate complaints and assess penalties, which includes the ability to conduct audits and require employers to make necessary adjustments to their operational practices.

Employees and employers can appeal the Department's decisions regarding alleged law violations. This appeal process ensures fairness and allows for a thorough review of the facts before any penalties are finalized.

Implementation Timeline

The law's provisions are set to take effect on July 1, 2024, allowing employers some time to adjust their practices and ensure full compliance as well as for outreach and education efforts to inform all stakeholders about the new requirements.

The Results?

While RCW 49.84 seeks to improve working conditions in warehouse distribution centers, it also presents several potential drawbacks:

  1. Increased Operational Costs: Employers may face higher costs due to additional administrative work needing to comply with the law, including updating systems to track quotas and work speed data accurately.
  2. Reduced Flexibility: The specific requirements for time accounting in quotas could reduce operational flexibility, making it harder for warehouses to quickly respond to fluctuating customer and business demands.
  3. Potential for Reduced Productivity: By imposing strict regulations on how quotas are set and enforced, overall productivity could decrease if employees and managers focus more on compliance than on efficiency. Furthermore, most businesses have already set realistic quotas that fully accommodate all legally mandated breaks or the realistic pacing of work throughout a shift.
  4. Legal and Compliance Risks: The complexity of the new rules might increase the risk of inadvertent non-compliance, potentially leading to legal challenges and penalties, which could be costly and time-consuming for businesses.
  5. Impact on Small Businesses: Smaller warehouse operators might find the requirements particularly burdensome, as they may need more resources to easily adjust their operations and management practices to comply with the new law.

These challenges suggest that while the law seeks to protect workers, it also necessitates careful implementation to avoid undue burden on warehouse operations, especially in a competitive economic environment. What do you think? Join in on the conversation. Become a member of the SafetyPro Podcast Community site today!


Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM
Blaine J. Hoffmann, MS OSHM

Blaine J. Hoffmann has been in the occupational safety & health industry for over 28 years and is the author of "Rethinking SAFETY Culture" and "Rethinking SAFETY Communications," available now. Blaine is the producer and host of The SafetyPro Podcast and founded the SafetyPro Podcast community site.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals